View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2006, 11:23 AM
atomicone's Avatar
atomicone atomicone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 840
Rep Power: 0
atomicone is on a distinguished road
Default Re: sublingual D-Bol?

Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Dawg
Hey President, no guy told me that. If you read my post it says: "According to the manufacturer it supposedly bypasses the liver totally because it is sublingual." The website stated it does no harm to the liver...we all know that is too good to be true.
I don't beleive everything I read so that is why I posted. Now technically if something enters your bloodstream VIA sublingual, it doesn't go through the digestive system, it goes straight to the blood stream, so it would avoid the first pass of the liver, but it would still be processed by the liver eventually, you are correct. But avoiding the first pass kind of cuts down on the toxicity one would think. Just my 2 cents.
E-Dawg,
Bro, taking any oral 17-alkaloid based AAS via oral, or injection won't prevent it from doing a double wammy on the liver. The reason these roids (e.g. D-bol, Winstrol, D-Rol, etc.) cause extra stress on the liver is not because they come in a pill form and have to be swallowed. If these particular substances did bypass the liver, and or did not make a second pass, they would ineffective. That is why they were converted to a 17-alkaloid base, so they would be active in one's blood stream. Therefore, the bottom line is that D-bol is D-bol, whether it's taken orally, sublingually, or via injection, it's still in its 17-alkaloid form (which is what causes it to make an extra passage through the liver) and will metabolize exactly the same way.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No