[Joe West]

hmmmm.

first of all, this article is a mixture of fact and fiction.

your nervous system has nothing to do with temperment, or very little. this is thinking from way back in the day before we made some breakthroughs in exactly what circulated and existed in the brain, as well as the total effects of said enzymes, hormones etc.

for example, schizophrenia isnt a nervous disorder. they have found that ppl with that particular illness has a brain that is a fraction of a second slower than normal brains. im not saying theyre dumb, im saying that there is now proof that their brain are organically different.

but heres something else to think about, that i dont recall readin in the article but is relevent to this discussion: science generally now says that humanity started in africa. who cares? well....

if you follow conventional wisdom from the begining to the end, in a purely logical fashion without predjudice, youd have to admit that would mean the following: if you beleive in darwinist theories, then we started out as a different sort of monkey then the ones still around. but a monkey nonetheless. long story short, blacks are the first homosapiens. theres no soft way to say this: following this logic, this would mean that blacks were the first out of the trees. it would follow that they possess more animal instincts and predispositons than someone further down the line. this would be a strong reason for why blacks generally6 excel in sports, and why no matter the income level theyre raised in, are always well behind in quotient tests for intelligence.

now, im not a racist. and i know there are plenty of blacks that are far and above more intelligent then the average white or asian.

other uncomfortable things such as the texture of hair etc are indicators of this as well. of all the books, articles and shows ive read about this, no one will touch this fact. but if you think about it, not even very hard, the inference is clear. and this isnt some david duke, hal turner shit: this is a legitimate, mainstream opinion now [as far as where humanity started].

if you transcribe this article, bottom line the facts, and apply them to animals, it fits. impulsivness, violence, oversexed, etc.

i sincerely dont mean this as racist insult.

as far as asians apparently being on top of the food chain:

this actually hold water, in a sense [BTW, im Irish/German]. virgin asian girls are the most intelligent in high school, although this advantage evaporates when they become sexually active. sex also seems to affect men in a similar manner: married men instantly stop being nearly as productive as single men. anyway.....

asians generally have a wider base of knowledge to draw from, and they are also metabolically more potent than other races. what do i mean? theyre smaller and require less calories. unlike whites and blacks, who with the advent of modern farming have grown quite a bit larger than even as little as 75 years ago [no fat jokes], they havent in a nearly as impressive fashion. this makes them able to subsist and thrive on much less than it would take for someone like myself, whos '6"3/288.

if everything revolves around survival, then those 2 general facts point to the possibility that as far as advancement, most asian races are ahead of the game. as far as modern world advantages, this doesnt play out in their favor as often as it would be assumed though.

and while its true that you cant get a real world result out of most stats, you can get a general one: every race if more criminal then they appear, its just that blacks are more criminal than most. every race has there lows and highs as far as intelligence, its just that asians are generally above the fold in comparison.

but dont let trending obfuscate reality.