Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zumper I wish seeing your exams on LH before going vacations, on the following week  |
It's not going to happen that quick I assure you but my trial will commence soon. As I realize that my bac/T trail will be monitored by many, I'm sure all will appreciate my prudence in making sure that my testing protocol will yield reliable results.
Can you imagine if I were to jump into it quickly and utilize the same, questionable, testing protocol that most anti-aging doctors subscribe to? I would be publishing possible misleading information on which you and others may make decisions.
As it stands now.....I believe that I will complete most of my research this weekend and complete my baseline testing the first part of next week at which time I will begin taking Bac and more testing to follow.
Other than my extensive research on testing methods, here is one more example of the amount of thought/time/planning that has to go into a responsible personal trial as I am about to undertake.......
I still have slight reservation as to whether or not to begin T first and drive my LH into the ground then begin Bac to see if it reverses the LH decline, or begin Bac first and possible increase my LH then begin T to see if my LH declines or remains stable.
The first testing protocol would yield whether or not Bac reverses T negative feedback , whereas the other would yield whether or not Bac stops T negative feedback. While I realize there is only a fine line between the two, in science sometimes it is the fine line that makes the difference.
Still the same, as it stands now, I will begin Bac first and T second as I don't want to put the little ones through any unnecessary pain and suffering and I will keep my fingers crossed that the aforesaid fine line makes no difference as, IMO, it is logical to assume if Bac stops LH decline then it would reverse it and vice versa.