View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2008, 12:52 PM
cpeil2 cpeil2 is offline
Veteran Member
Points: 6,062, Level: 33
Points: 6,062, Level: 33 Points: 6,062, Level: 33 Points: 6,062, Level: 33
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,115
Rep Power: 7
cpeil2 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Why are some TRT treatments not FDA approved?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LowTestosterone38 View Post
The other stuff though....the anti-estrogen/anti-aromatase drugs...man, taking a woman's breast cancer drug just doesnt seem safe to me. Id like to see those drugs get some formal study and FDA approval.

Fred

If the AI or SERM were something like a chemotherapy agent intended to kill tumor cells by poisoning them, yes, it would be foolish to take such a drug unless you had breast cancer.


But SERMs and AIs act on estradiol, depriving certain tumor cell lines of the estradiol they need to thrive. To me, it's a big difference.

That's not to say that anbody should take SERMs or AIs casually. Some guys, and their docs, have the mistaken notion that an anti-E should be routinely taken.

Actually, an anti-E should only be taken after laboratory confirmation that the guy's E2 needs to be managed

The best and most experienced TRT docs use anti-E's with a lot of caution.


Its a good thing to maintain some skepticism. There are a lot of docs out there looking to increase their revenue stream by offering TRT after taking a weekend seminar sponsored by a compounding pharmacy.
Reply With Quote


Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No