fake-enheit 911 debunked

[Stephen]

link

this is a good read that shows why this movie is truly a work of fiction.

stephen

[Quasimoto]

Originally Posted by Windigo

Dude there is no need to post a page from some websight. Just look at the 20/20(9/11) commission's report. It pretty much debunks all of Moore’s claims about 9/11 anyway.

DeBunk them huh..WOW Michael Moore owes someone alot of money then, since he offered a bounty of 10k per instance of anything that wasnt factual.

Anyone else but me thinks is weird that the 9/11 commission was only given 11 million to investigate 9/11 but that same Government spent 70million to find out whether Bill Clinton actually fucked Monica Lewinski ? Which seems deserving of more resources to you guys ?

[Bob Smith]

Moores movies are nothing more than liberal propaganda and distortion.

dis·tor·tion (d-stôrshn)
2. A statement that twists fact; a misrepresentation.

That pretty much sums up every piece of work that he has ever put out. I cant see how any rational, thinking human being can believe that crap that he puts out under the guise of "documentary."

[Quasimoto]

Every filmmaker has the inherent right to make a film thats entertaining , dont they ? Bob, have you seen Farhenheit 9/11 ? I have seen it, and bowling for columbine too. All films are made from a biased perspective, one way or another. If you think that the documentary will serve up info in a manner that you wont like , or that you find objectionable ...dont fucking go see the film..but dont refer that one who does make that choice is a stupid person incapable of conscious thought

*** See Bobs comment : I cant see how any rational, thinking human being can believe that crap that he puts out under the guise of "documentary." .

I would think that to be a simple concept fellas.

Main Entry: de·bunk
Pronunciation: (")dE-'b&[ng]k
Function: transitive verb
: to expose the sham or falseness of
- de·bunk·er noun

Falseness means not true, doesnt it ?
It pretty much debunks all of Moore’s claims about 9/11 anyway.

[tHe_ShOcKeR]

fuck you if you think i'm gonna read all that.

[Quasimoto]

Does it in anyway Debunk the film's purported accuracy ? NO.

Are the facts arranged in a manner to bring to bear a very specific message to the viewer ? YES. All filmakers have the right to make a jaded, slanted and biased POV . Who gives a fuck ? If this Movie made 400k at the box office you wouldnt give a squirt of piss what the message was. Are you scared this piece of Filmwork ? Have you even seen it , or are you telling me not too cuz you refuse too ?

Spiderman was jaded dude, so was that BS fucking Passion of the Christ. They galvanize some, and polarize most people....Big fucking deal. Make a point , thats all i am saying

[Bob Smith]

When someones point of view is to specifically ignore other facts and to show video that purposely misleads people from reality, then thats bullshit when its done in a documentary fashion. If it was meant to be fiction or just entertainment, then thats one thing. But when its used as liberal propaganda with the idea that it is true and factual, then thats another issue.

[Slick Arrado]

Originally Posted by Bob Smith

then thats bullshit when its done in a documentary fashion.

Exactly. This was supposed to be a "documentary", but it's clearly propaganda.

[Kayz]

Since it obviously slanted in one direction to fulfill moore's agenda, it cannot really even be called a documentary. A documentary takes both sides and allows the viewer to draw his/her own conclusions. F911 is just Moore shoving his liberal bullshit down everyones' throats.

Kind of funny how Kerry is trying very hard to distance himself fromt he radical lefts in this country...cuz' he knows that that shit does not work iwth the American people.