Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DLMCBBB You might not rule out other possible explanations, but the notion of "PRIMING" the HP seems to be the only area in which you are sterring. |
You are stuck on this issue. Not me.
The primary points I'm making in this thread regarding HCG are (a) that HCG dosing is very tricky, and (b) as a result, improper HCG dosing often yields results that are misinterpretted.
For whatever reason(!), the body gradually produces more T in response to a fixed dosage of HCG over time. I have been aware of this empirical fact for a few years now as I have gradually reduced my HCG dosage over the 5 years that I have been on an HCG only protocol. My personal experience as well as the sources cited earlier in this thread (Dr. Shippen's opinions, the Medline article, etc.) have caused me to wonder why the gradual increase in responsiveness to HCG occurs. While it's an worthwhile exercise to theorize why this gradual increase in responsiveness to HCG occurs, that's not what's relevant to this thread. What's relevant to this thread is THAT it occurs, not WHY it occurs.
My point in stating this thread was to compare the 3 protocols listed in the title. You can't compare these 3 protocols fairly, unless you fully understand how to properly dosage HCG.