HGH for first cycle????

[Alphamale23]

i got a friend thats never done a cycle before or even used creatine. hes 24 and 5' 8" about 170 and 20%bf. i advised him to do a standard test cycle for his first because he needs to add muscle but he has been convinced to do HGH for first cycle. is this smart/stupid?

[Homer simpson]

Originally Posted by Alphamale23

i got a friend thats never done a cycle before or even used creatine. hes 24 and 5' 8" about 170 and 20%bf. i advised him to do a standard test cycle for his first because he needs to add muscle but he has been convinced to do HGH for first cycle. is this smart/stupid?

Ok ask your friend how much he is going to do and the amount of time he is willing to stay on? Have him read a little bit about the effects of both. Then show him how much that will cost to get anything out of the growth. Compare and contrast the pros and cons of both, I'm sure he will go with the cheaper cycle. Sometimes you cant tell people they are wrong, but if you approach him and say " lets try to work something out for you", and then show the differences he might change his mind.

Homer

[para]

Originally Posted by Alphamale23

i got a friend thats never done a cycle before or even used creatine. hes 24 and 5' 8" about 170 and 20%bf. i advised him to do a standard test cycle for his first because he needs to add muscle but he has been convinced to do HGH for first cycle. is this smart/stupid?

If I knew then what I know now and could of afforded it I would of used GH from my very first cycle.

If he runs GH with a 5/600mg's test not only will he add muscle, he will drop BF but more importantly he will strengthen his tendons and ligaments.

As Homer said its all about cost. To cut back on the test for the sake of the growth is not the way to go.

I also beleive though he may think GH is the 'magic' substance. It is only if he works/eats/trains correctly....

[Tank01]

Originally Posted by para

If I knew then what I know now and could of afforded it I would of used GH from my very first cycle.

If he runs GH with a 5/600mg's test not only will he add muscle, he will drop BF but more importantly he will strengthen his tendons and ligaments.

As Homer said its all about cost. To cut back on the test for the sake of the growth is not the way to go.

I also beleive though he may think GH is the 'magic' substance. It is only if he works/eats/trains correctly....

very well said para.. couldnt have put it better myself

[dumblucky]

24 is too young to use HGH IMO

[ydrpysg]

gh would make for a very expensive cycle. he's not very large at this point. i think creatine, protein, and hardwork would do wonders...

[odc]

I second that opinion. IMO, the sides of GH are far to great to risk for a fist time cycler. He dosen't even know how he will react to the AAS, let alone the GH.

[Alphamale23]

money is not really an object for him, hes doing very well. but its already in the works so i guess there is no stopping it now, i dont think he will get any sides from the doses he is taking.

[mr.big]

Originally Posted by Alphamale23

i got a friend thats never done a cycle before or even used creatine. hes 24 and 5' 8" about 170 and 20%bf. i advised him to do a standard test cycle for his first because he needs to add muscle but he has been convinced to do HGH for first cycle. is this smart/stupid?

He sounds like a lazy bastard to me.

[OneStrongMutha]

Originally Posted by Exosist

Does anyone else think this?

bump, i am also interested in why he would say this

[Dart]

Originally Posted by mr.big

He sounds like a lazy bastard to me.

... lmao!