It was by Nelson Montana and it talked about how guys in the 70s and such had no gyno and didnt use antiestrogens, especially
clomid which showed 1 out of 4 BBs respond badly to it and it doesnt work well. what do you all think about that?
It also mentioned using calcium glucarate as an anti E. im one of those guys who agrees with Nelson when he talks about todays guys using way too much gear and that is why alot guys have to use anti E's so they dont get gyno. and i totally agree on his views which is the same as William Llewelyns about estrogen being a vital part of the muscle buildup process and to not use anti E's unless they are absolutely totally necessary.
Maybe thats why guys like Schwarzenegger, Ferrigno, Columbu used plenty of
Dianabol and were massive without the bad side effects. Could the Ciba
Dianabol back then be much better than todays stuff though. Im pretty sure MaxRep who was around these guys back then talked about that somewhere and said the 5mg blue little pills were different and seemed to work better.
You think they will ever manufacture DBal in the U.S. again legally. I mean they make Anadrol50 which is much stronger and toxic then Dbal, but prescribe it to people. Wouldnt you think the medical community would find that Dbal is much safer at lower doses for people who need it for wasting diseases and such. sorry to jump around here but it all makes me wonder what is being preached today may be wrong, at least in some ways depending on your goals.