Einstein will have some good info on this.
I can input experience. I used serostim 4-6iu/day a couple years ago and it was pretty good. I shot an 18mg kit of NuD on April 19 and will be using a 22.5mg kit on May 17. Since one month is short in
GH terms all I can say is that there is definitely a spiking of
gh levels on this stuff. I can feel my hands swell up on high days and feel normal on low days. I can also say that there is an 'overage' of
gh in the kit as the manufacturer puts it. So even though it says that the 18mg kit is only 1.8IU/day and the 22.5mg kits is 2.25IU/day, those numbers are an average guide. Many days during the month on the 18mg kit I felt my hands at a level that I did not when using 6iu serostim. Sorry I don't have better info but that's it. Can't say it's very scientific but I would estimate that some days there is a whole lot more than 1.8IU being released. Some days it seems like there isn't much, so perhaps there are enough of those off days to avoid suppression. I don't know for sure. I will be running a few months of 22.5mg kits and then one final month at 18mg. I'll let you all know how it goes.
If your question is just around production quality. Both should be great if they're legit. NuD provides convenience, humatrope provides the chance to optimally time your
gh, most likely the benefits of this will not be so drastic that you will notice them, unless you are running
slin then I would think it would be more important to time your
gh shots.
I'd listen to whatever Einstein has to say about this, but I imagine his preference would be to use humatrope unless you convenience is a top priority.
nutropin depot vs. humatrope 
Linear Mode
