Omnadren 250 vs. Sustanon 250

[Zeo]

Originally Posted by atomicone

I understand your point (and taken), but in the early days the original Omnadren was formulated a bit differently than Sustanon and users usually took lower dosages and had more androgenic side-effects. I've tried both, and personally feel Sustanon is the best of the two. But like you said above for the most part, test it test.

so whats the esters in omnadrens?

How do you guys run omnas

[ch11]

People claim they get lesss bloat from the esthers in omna, but ive never actually tried so i wouldnt say thast nessarily true. They are one in the same though pretty much id personally get omnas because there cheaper and sound like the same thing. I think Sustanon vs omnadren is a marketing type of thing.

[Homer simpson]

Both are designed for long term HR treatment. With frequent dosing blood levels are going to be indistinguishable between the two drugs. Ignor all the arm chair advice about how one provides less water retention, or the other results in less acne or androgenic side effects. Its all bs. Testosterone is testosterone and I for one would always go with what provided the most milligrams for the dollar.

But sometimes if i have the extra i'll go with the preloads, but omnas are just as good as sust.

Homer

[Kingpin]

http://www.mesomorphosis.com/steroid...nadren-250.htm

Here you go!

[Zeo]

UPDATED: As of fall 2000, the formula for Omnadren 250 is identical to the formula for Sustanon 250.

[Zeo]

so you'd run omen kind of like prop since there short acting esters?????????

[Phenom]

Thanks a bunch for all the info, helped me make my decision.

[jocko]

same thing

[granby140]

i gained a lot more on the susts then on omnas but who knows maybe i did something else different.

[Zeo]

Originally Posted by granby140

i gained a lot more on the susts then on omnas but who knows maybe i did something else different.

Maby you got fakes