Superdrol

[lifterdude]

Originally Posted by MANWHORE

is it even possible to gain 7lbs of muscle in 2 weeks .... even if you were regaining back lost muscle? A lean gain and muscle gain can be different. 7lbs of lean gain doesn't mean it is all muscle. Anyway,7lbs is nice in 2 weeks depending where you started from,of course

Ok I mispoke, I was just going by how much fat I lost with what my weight was at the end. I just said lean mass gain of 7lbs, it was just a 7lbs gain that was not fat.

Also for if this can be done in 2weeks, most superdrol cycles I have seen are 3weeks long. Mass gains start to stall after 3weeks, strength continues, but mass subdues for some reason. Great stuff by itself, but would be even better in a cutting cycle with some other things. Maybe some test prop.

[SprintR]

So i guess Superdrol would give you a positive drug test right?

[MANWHORE]

Originally Posted by lifterdude

Mass gains start to stall after 3weeks, strength continues, but mass subdues for some reason.

Probably because in just 3 weeks most mass is from sarcoplasmic hypertrophy but if strength is still increasing then my guess is eventually so will muscle tissue.... I work with this guy whos son just bought some Impact Nutrition products. He is coming home in about a week so he sent the products home to his father and his father showed them to me. I told him to sell them or send them back and try some Superdrol. I told him i'd get info on it if he wanted to try it. It sounds like good stuff but are guys who have used AAS using it with good results?

[Donk]

Superdrol is the real deal. I have used M1T ,high dose M4OHN, transdermal 1test, and 4AD. Not gone fully to the darkside yet.

The gains come quick like M1T. My abs are easier to see from the diaretic effect. No shitty lethargy like M1T. Pumps can be a bit painful in the gym. Got some lower back tightness but not as bad as M1T. Went from 238 to 249 3 weeks at 20mg/day 1st week to 10mg/day 2nd and third.

PCT was easy unlike the m1t. Ran clomid and rebound xt for 4weeks. Strength kept increasing whole time during pct.

Bench went from 315x5x3sets at week 2 to 325x5x2sets 335x5x1set after pct.

[SprintR]

So would it make you test positive in a drugs test or not?

[MikeHeavypecs]

thanks for whoever wrote the above "article" on SuperDrol! I started taking it just a little over a week ago and have already gained 3 lbs (240 now) and look more cut. So far I'm impressed! My pumps are tremendous and seen to stay very long after the workouts! Can't wait to see how I do this week and next on it......

Mike

[MANWHORE]

Well,it looks like it may be a good product but all this weight gained in such a short amount of time isn't muscle. Remember creatine when it 1st came out ... I gained 10lbs in 5 days from the Phosphagen. It sounds good though

[roadkill]

anyone think it would be a good product to take 2 weeks on 4 weeks off year round? Appreciate your feedback.

[MANWHORE]

Originally Posted by roadkill

anyone think it would be a good product to take 2 weeks on 4 weeks off year round?

i don't

[Shock133]

Originally Posted by Bigkarch

BTW, I also have to say to Shock, dont be such an asshole to our members that are merely stating their opinion or asking questions you think are dumb, or have been asked before....thank you....

I don't recall saying someone was dumb or thinking that, merely frustrated from people not taking the advice given multiple times throughout the thread. I believe in reading the whole thread before posting. Also, I'm a big fan of self education. Often if one uses a simple search engine on the internet you can find so much information that leads into the exact subject one was researching and a whole other world of related tangents. If that was being an asshole then I guess people are pretty thin skinned.

[Shock133]

Originally Posted by roadkill

anyone think it would be a good product to take 2 weeks on 4 weeks off year round? Appreciate your feedback.

No, it's a bad idea. I see where you're coming from though. You're probably thinking that since 2 weeks is such a short cycle and has virtually no visible side effects that 4 weeks off would put you right in line for another cycle. What you have to take into consideration is the effects on your insides, i.e. lipid values, blood pressure and so on. These side effects are the ones to keep your eyes on and also the ones that will make your health down the road very fragile.

There is plenty of discussion around about such concerns and you should take a look at it if you still believe it's a good idea. This compound will give you such good gains in such a short amount of time with a proper protocol that you really don't need it all year round.

Try 3 weeks on at whatever dosage works for you then do proper PCT. Check your blood work at the end of those two timeframes and see where you stand before you think about another one.

Think long term guy. Your liver will thank you.

[MANWHORE]

Hey guys Impact Nutrition just came out with a new product that's stronger than tren Now come on,why would Jeff lie. ... I want to see some before and after pics before i buy stock in the Superdrol

[Shock133]

Originally Posted by MANWHORE

Well,it looks like it may be a good product but all this weight gained in such a short amount of time isn't muscle. Remember creatine when it 1st came out ... I gained 10lbs in 5 days from the Phosphagen. It sounds good though

I see your concern about the quick weight gain. However, creatine is a poor compound to compare. They're definitely nothing alike and work by two totally different mechanisms. Water retention in the form of your body wanting to create an isotonic state inside your muscle cells due to increased glycogen retention is to blame for some initial weight gain but not all.

It is possible to add muscle in such a short period of time such as 2 or 3 weeks. You have to look into the mechanisms these androgens work by and relish in how amazing of a machine the human body is. Try and forget the conjecture you've heard and look at the objective evidence.

People have been using this substance in protocols for sometime now and look at the results. After PCT and equal time off of everything they have been keeping whatever weight they've gained during the cycle. Now, once the substance is out of one's system completely one have to agree that the effects it created would have subsided, i.e. increased water and glycogen retention. What is the weight difference from before the cycle began?? It seems to me that it would have to be muscle.

That's my opinion.

[MANWHORE]

So you don't believe a product can be used to increase nutrient density without the gain being lost after the product in discontinued?

[Shock133]

Originally Posted by MANWHORE

So you don't believe a product can be used to increase nutrient density without the gain being lost after the product in discontinued?

I'm not familiar with the term "nutrient density" except when it refers to the nutrition of a particular food compared to another like watermelon and soda. They both have 150 calories let's say but the watermelon is more nutrient rich. That's the only definition I'm aware of. You'll have to elaborate a bit more.

I can respond, however, to this in a more general fashion. Let's say, hypothetically, that after two months, or any arbitrary time within reason, from the discontinuance of a certain substance this particular subject has still maintained his gains. What is this due to? I would personally say that it's a gain in skeletal muscle mass. That's my opinion once again from what I've researched and read throughout the years.

Please feel free to educate me if I'm off base.