Sustanon vs Enanthate

[rpmjr19]

Almost everyone always suggests enanthate over sustanon 250. why is that?

alot of profiles say things such as this about sustanon "The side effects of Sustanon are similar to those of Testosterone enanthate (see also Testosterone enanthate) only that they are usually less frequent and less severe."

"unlike other testosterone compounds such as cypionate and enanthate, the use of Sustanon leads to less water retention and estrogenic side effects. This characteristic is extremely beneficial to bodybuilders who suffer from gynecomastia yet still seek the powerful anabolic effect of an injectable testosterone. The decreased water retention also makes Sustanon a desirable steroid for bodybuilders and athletes interested in cutting up or building a solid foundation of quality mass"

so if sustanon 250 is comparable to enanthate, but supposedly has less sides, why not go with sustanon?

[mr.nitro]

read this:
https://www.musclemaniax.com/forums/...light=Sustanon

[rpmjr19]

thanks nitro

[terrorizer2]

i have always found testoviron to be more reliably dosed than some sustanon.With sus you get a build up of test as the cycle goes on due to the 4 esters,but enanthate is easier to 'manage'.

[Big_paul]

enethate is a better buy for your money. I also think you can maintain consistent blood levels easier.

[Deacon]

Originally Posted by Big_paul

enethate is a better buy for your money. I also think you can maintain consistent blood levels easier.

and I agree - I haveyet to see anythign to prove that the theory of the mixed esters is all that much more effective - on paper sus sounds good but in reality it is overpriced and overhyped