Who's read Llewellyn's 'Anabolics 2006'?

[airnzah]

I recently just downloaded William Llewellyn's Anabolics 06 (looking for the 07 edition, but was unlucky). It's very, very informative, it's got all we need to know about roids.

one thing I gotta ask though, for those who've read it, is the sample cycles section, w/c there are some cycles that has no testosterone base (i.e. dbol/deca, all orals, etc). not to say that their not effective, coz they definitely are, but aren't they a little outdated? what about the major 'suppressed test'? I mean, I believe in the logic of test as base in any cycle (high or low dosage) I've learned from these sites/forum.

I'm just curious about that, considering the author's reputation.

Any thoughts would be appreciated

[novicebb]

I just think he was listed some known cycles for bulking, cutting and others. Not necessarily something he advocates.

[Stormbringer]

I agree with NoviceBB. I jave his books back for a few years and 2007 and the just list some pretty well known cycles even from back in the day.

[advanced-stealth]

I have them up till 2007. They are very informative books with great info on steroids. Llewellyn has a great reputation in this industry.

Now doing the cycles he lists would be on a person to person basis. Most say you must have Test for every cycle, but many do not follow that and have great results.

[ffrreeaakk]

he should not have included nolotil if he himself had no experience with the drug. his info on nolotil is totally off.

[MrBman]

yea im personally against using cycles with out testosterone ... its the only natural hormone ur body will recognize as its own in regards to any steroid cycle - it makes for better recovery if you include it in a cycle - just my opinion