I don't see what all the fuss is about or how this method has critics?
This is how we used to train period.
I'm now 38, been away from the sport since 92-93. I trained in AZ and CA. At that time was when most of the routines accepted now were begun.
Guys found out through the steroid bible, that red book with the light blue print, that lactic acid plays a major role in building muscle.
Then the logic was go for the bur, and burn more. Gear will help you grow, but when exercising like that you might as well take up a trade, like brick laying. Constant low-mid weight/high reps.
A lot of guys were too embarrassed to admit they had the look, and could barely bench 300. But they could grab the 100DBs for 30 reps, so they were strong that way.
Still what's the point of only looking strong? It's like having one of those Lamboghini's that is really a body kit on a Fiero, or Camaro.
We always believed when on a cycle you would do things you never thought of to yourself to maximize the effectiveness of the
AAS.